Just imagine, the individual who marginalized
nearly half of Iraq's population, and who during his
ongoing period of rule saw the Christians driven out
of their own country and harassed, is now describing
the Arab Gulf states as tyrannical and is attacking
them!
Just imagine the person who came [to power] on the
back of an American tank, and whose term in office as
Prime Minister was renewed for him despite losing the
elections, and whose people came out and demonstrated
on the day they regretted merely voting for him, is
now talking about democracy and freedoms!
Just imagine this; during his time in power more
Iraqis were killed than during the Saddam Hussein era
and all his wars and he is now talking about rights
and justice?
Just imagine that the Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al
Maliki, whose term was renewed based on Iranian-US
approval and whose government killed approximately 14
anti-government protesters a few days ago, is now
attacking the Arab Gulf states on the pretext of
defending the Shia of Bahrain and is giving lectures
on freedom and democracy and talking about the winds
of change. Can anything be more ironic than this? How
can Nuri al Maliki be the Prime Minister to the whole
of Iraq, with all its Sunnis, Shia, Christians and
other components, whilst using the same language as
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad or Hassan Nasrallah? We have
written so much on the sectarianism of the Iraqi
government and its subordination to Iran and we were
told that we were exaggerating. And now we have the
Arabs, the people of the Gulf in particular, and of
course the Iraqis before them, dumbstruck at what al
Maliki and others like him, such as Muqtada al Sadr
who lives in Iran and Ahmed al Chalabi, one of the
most prominent figures of the US occupation of Iraq,
do and say. How can people of this sectarian mindset
be guardians of the various components of the Iraqi
nation?
When al Maliki attacks the Gulf States and their
leaders he is confirming one fact to us; that the
current sectarian Iraqi regime is not democratic. He
is also confirming that this regime will not last at
all in this extreme form as Iraq does not belong to
the Shia or to any one sect and nor should it. Rather,
al Maliki's attack will isolate the Iraqi regime and
it has no future with this kind of logic unless it
wants to be like Hezbollah, which also has no future.
But there is one very important point to which we must
pay attention; we are fortunate that all the cards
have been revealed and the game has become clear
today.
The lie that is the democracy of Iraq can no longer
continue and it cannot be said that Baghdad has
returned as an active member on the Arab scene;
rather, Iraq has become an active member in the
process of the exportation of the Iranian project in
the region.
This is not a Sunni-Shia issue, but rather an issue
of who believes in the homeland and who believes in
the Wali al Faqih [Guardian Jurist] and there is a big
difference between the two. Therefore, we are
fortunate today that the process of separating [the
two] has taken place with very clear results and has
happened faster than we thought as this helps us to
know who Iran's agents are and to know who are truly
eager for their own homelands. With regards to al
Maliki and others in Baghdad who are attacking the
Gulf States, one can only say to them: if you have no
shame then do as you please!