|
The Siege Of Daraa: Shame Ahmedinejad’s Iran, Shame Assad And His Regime's Thugs
05 May 2011 By Abdul Rahman Al-Rashid
The tragic situation in Daraa shows that the Syrian
authorities do not want to end the city's
demonstrations; rather they want to set an example, to
make other protestors across the republic learn the
hard way. All reports confirm this because the
situation in this small city is extremely dangerous;
streets are littered with corpses, patients are left
without medication, and hundreds of youths are being
detained in camps. Daraa is deprived of water and
suffers electricity blackouts; food and medicine are
denied access into the city, whilst shops, groceries
and even pharmacies have all been looted by the
regime's thugs.
The Syrian regime is definitely mistaken, for Daraa
will indeed be an example, but the Syrian people will
"learn the hard way" to fight the regime, rather than
fear it. The stories of the Daraa people have incensed
the Syrians, pitting them against the authorities and
their practices. Such a marginal border city could in
fact be the Achilles' heel for the regime in Damascus,
and the crucial weakness that will put an end to a
powerful regime, something that all other forces
failed to do so in the past 40 years. Daraa triggered
protests across Syrian cities, provoking the feelings
of Arabs, including those who once sympathized with
the regime. The residents' cries have reached even the
most remote countries, and the world has expressed
condemnation, calling for intervention and perhaps
change. Daraa is the symbol of the world's protest
against the Syrian regime, and everyone cannot believe
what is going on there. An independent report
described this as similar to acts committed by the
Serbs against the residents of Bosnia, when Serbian
troops isolated small cities, tortured their
residents, and starved them.
The siege of Daraa reminds us of the siege of Tell
al-Zaatar camp, where residents were forced to eat
cats and dogs in order to survive. The fierce Syrian
security apparatus intentionally left corpses to rot
in the streets of Daraa, targeted homes to intimidate
their inhabitants, looted pharmacies, closed hospitals
and pursued doctors. These moves aimed to deter the
Daraa residents [from demonstrating], although
official statistics say that the protestors in the
city are only a small minority. If this is the case,
why are all the city's residents being besieged and
murdered?
We are aware that the Syrian authorities are
fighting for their destiny, and that they are not
dealing with a minor rebel force or a terrorist group.
The authorities are facing a mass uprising, which is
getting fiercer with every passing Friday, and it will
not be quelled by dubious admissions on television
screens, nor will the truth be concealed by denying
media access to the areas of confrontation and
protest. What can the authorities do in the face of
such increasing uprisings across the country, and the
hundreds of thousands of protestors who are not
deterred by the security troops, the army, and thugs?
Every time a horrific, bloody image appears, the
authority loses more of its citizens who refuse to
support it anymore, and decide to join those seeking
change.
If the regime wants to be salvaged from the flood
of change, it should loosen its grip on governance, as
all other world countries have done. Even the closest
groups to Syria have now begun to distance themselves
from the regime, including Hamas, which was a staunch
supporter for decades. Turkey has also demanded that
the regime change before it is toppled. As for the
members of the Security Council who tried to veto any
international resolution against the Syrian regime,
including China, Russia and India, these states will
soon abandon it when more stories of the Daraa tragedy
and other cities appear.
Damascus is certainly suffering a crisis within its
leadership, as officials disagree on how to confront
the crisis. President Bashar al-Assad was prepared to
announce reformative resolutions following his first
address, yet it was rumored that his associates forced
him to retreat, giving priority to the security
solution. These were the reforms which Bouthaina
Shaaban, the Syrian President's media advisory, had
leaked to the Syrian news media. Yet, unfortunately,
the regime missed its opportunity, and even if it
offered the concessions it had promised, it would now
be too late. The leadership must present its
scapegoats, announce a wide-ranging reform program,
and set a date for parliamentary elections, under
international supervision. Only then will the regime
be able to repair what it destroyed.
©
EsinIslam.Com
Add
Comments |