|
9 July 2009 As the heat of Western media
borbandment continue to take show its effects of
Ahmadinjad The Rafidi, the leader of Mushrik republic
of Iran expressed a clear disbelief in Islam when
slandering the Sahabah despite he stubbornness
insisting he had said on air nothing but the basic
beliefs of twelver Shiism, as declared ages before him
by Khomeini the accursed one and co.!
This accursed Rafidi, expressed the basic belief of
twelver Rafidi Shiism, namely that almost all of the
Companions of the Prophet (peace be upon him, his
household and his companions) turned Apostates after
his demise, except a handful! This is not his personal
view, neither is he an “extreme” twelver Shiite, nay!
the reality is he is declaring nothing but the basic
beliefs of the Religion of twelver Shiism (Al-Rafidah),
as been declared by their most important books and
sayings of their giant scholars:
Marked Part:
Abi Ja’far (”infallible” Imam of the Shia) said,’
The people apostated after the demise of the
Prophet (saws) except of three.’ We asked him
who are they ? He said:” Al-Miqdad, Abu Tharr and
Salman Al-Farsi.
If all of that were mentioned in ONE book
and by ONE scholar we would have accepted it to be
weak in Rafidah Religion.
Let us make a list of some SHIA SCHOLARS
who say that all sahaba turned apostate
except few.
Kulaini
Al-Kashi
Ali Bin Ibrahim Al-Qummi
Maqbool Hussain Dehlevi
Now lets see how many ahadeeths speak the same.
All Sahabah companions except 3 left
Islaam after demise of Nabi.
Anwaar – No’maan Niyyah – P245. Vol 2. Nimatullah
Jafaari./ Furu Kafi, Kitaabul Raudah :115 – Mullah
Muhammad bin Yaqoob Kulaini Vol 3 P115/ Usul -e-Kafi
Vol 2, P 246 Rijaal Kashi P. 504.
Sahabahbecame infidel by denying the
divine right (Wilayat) of Hazrat Ali. First three
caliph and other Sahabas became
infidel by denying the divine right of (Wilayat) of
Hazrat Ali. (Usool Kaafi, Page No. 420)
All the people rejected Islam after the death
of the Prophet except three. Miqdad, Abu Zar
and Salman Farsi. (Quran Majeed by Maqbool Hussain
Dehlevi, Page No. 134)
The Munafiqeen (i.e. Sahaba) took very much out
of Quran (took out the verses).” (Ihtijaj at Tabrasi,
page #382).
There was no sahabi who believed in the
Rafidi fairy-tale of Ali being infallible Imam (not
even Ibn Abbas from the Ahl Al-Bayt!), which means all
are apostates.
What is the truth about
Talhah and Zubayr?
Talha ibn Ubayd-Allah and Zubair ibn al-Awam were
one of the two companions, whom the Prophet (saws)
promised the Paradise.
Abdur-Rahman bin Al-Akhnas said that when he was in
the mosque, a man abused Ali (RA). So Saeed bin Zayd
got up and said: “I bear witness to the Apostle of
Allah (SAWS) that I heard him say: “Ten
persons will go to Paradise: “Abu Bakr will go to
Paradise, Umar will go to Paradise, Uthman will go to
Paradise, Ali will go to Paradise, Talha will go to
Paradise: Zubair bin Al-Awwam will go to Paradise,
Sa’d bin Abi Waqqas will go to Paradise and
Abdur-Rahman bin Awf will go to Paradise. If I wish, I
can mention the tenth.” The People asked: “Who is he?”
so he kept silence. They again asked: “Who is he?” He
replied: “He is Saeed ibn Zayd.” He then said: “The
company of one man whose face has been covered with
dust by the Apostle of Allah (SAWS) is better than the
actions of one of you for a whole life time even if he
is granted the life-span of Noah.” [Abu Dawud]
These Ten Companions are listed below, together
with the dates of when they lived and died:
1. Abu Bakr As-Siddiq (51 B.H-13 A.H; 573-634 C.E)
2. Umar bin Al-Khattab Al-Farooq (40 B.H-23 A.H;
584-644 C.E)
3. Uthman bin Affan Ghani Dhun-Nurayn (47 B.H- 35 A.H;
577-656 C.E)
4. Ali bin Abi Talib (23 B.H- 40 A.H; 600-661 C.E)
5. Talha bin Ubaidullah (28 B.H-36 A.H; 596-656 C.E)
6. Zubair bin Al-Awwaam (28 B.H-36 A.H; 596-656 C.E)
7. Abdur-Rahman bin Awf (passed away 31 A.H/654 C.E)
8. Sa’d bin Abi Waqqas (23 B.H-55 A.H; 600-675 C.E)
9. Saeed bin Zaid (passed away 51 A.H)
10.Abu Ubaidah Aamir bin Abdullah bin Al-Jarrah.
In the battle of Jamal, the Hypocritesand rebels
from both sides (Alis and Aishas) started the battle
well known Jamal battle on both sides, yet Zubair was
unwilling to fight against Ali and left the
battlefield. It is said that during the battle Ali
called Zubair and recalled him the saying of Prophet
Mohammad that:
“You will one day fight against Ali, over an unjust
cause”
Recalling this saying of
Prophet Mohammad (saws), Zubair left the battlefield
and was killed during prayers by one of the soldier of
Ali’s army who was chasing him. On hearing the news of
Zubair’s assasination, Ali is reported to have said to
the killer of Zubair:
“May you burn in hell”
So let us, the Ahl
Al-Sunnah, the real followers of Ahl Al-Bayt (i.e.
Ali) say the same to the enemy of Zubayr in this age:
‘May you burn in hell Ahmadinejad!
For even Shia sources approve
the love of Ali (ra) towards his brothers Al-Zubayr
and Talhah
For even Shia sources approve
the love of Ali (ra) towards his brothers Al-Zubayr
and Talhah:
Amir Al-Mu’mineen Ali even mourned for Talhah and
Zubayr when they were killed.
“Both Talha and Zubayr fell, and Imam
`Ali magnanimously mourned the fallen and had them
honourably buried”
Rafidah Shias are indeed pathetic. The way they
define a righteous is by comparing it to
infallibility. This is a status only restricted to
Prophets. Talha (ra) and Zubair (ra) were great
Companions. Even Imam Ali (ra) acknowledged this in
their funerals. He also pointed out the sacrifices
that they made from Islam. The reality is when it
comes to the status of the Sahabah the Rafidah Shais
judge them like the Khawarij judge the Muslims.
This is the balanced Sunnah view.
قال العلامة الفاخوري رحمه الله في
كتابه تحفة الأنام في تاريخ الاسلام ص67:
“على أن معشر اهل الحق من اهل
السنة والجماعة يعتقدون أن معاوية كان مخطئاً، بغى على
الإمام الحق علي بن أبي طالب لسبق البيعة والخلافة له
رضي الله عنه، وهو مصيب بمحاربة معاوية وأصحابه بحكم
قتال أهل البغي من المسلمين، ولذا لم يعاملهم معاملة
المرتدين ولاالكافرين، وأن عائشة وطلحة والزبير رضي الله
عنهم قد رجعوا عن خطئهم بخروجهم في وقعة الجمل على أمير
المؤمنين، وقد ندموا على خروجهم متأسفين، والندم توبة من
الخطيئة، فاتبع الحق ولاتتبع الهوى فيضلك عن سبيل الله
والله أعلم”. اهـ.
- Allama Al-Fakhouri, the grand Shafi’iy Mufti of
Beirut ( rahmatullahi alayhi) said in his book “
Tarikh al-islam” ( History of Islam), page 67:
“ The people of righteousness ( Ahlul Haqq) of
Ahlus Sunnah wal Jam’a believe that Mu’awiyah was
mistaken, transgressed on the righteous Khalifah Ali
bin Abi Taleb. As he had the Bay’ah and Khilafah,
radiya’Allahu anhu. And that he –Ali- is righteous in
fighting Mu’awiyah and his companions based on the
rules of Transgressors of Muslims, hence, he
did not treat them as Kuffar (blasphemers) nor
rejectors. And that Aisha, Talha and Zubair,
radiya’Allahu anhum, all repented for their
mistake to go to the battle of Jamal, and
they regretted it sorrowfully. Regret is a sign of
–sincere- repentance, so follow the truth not your
desires, otherwise you will deviate from the path of
Allah, and Allah knows best”.
Aishah (ra), Talhah (ra) and Zubair (ra) repented
after they transgressed. There is a verse in the Quran
which asks for sinners to be forgiven.
40:7. Those (angels) who bear the Throne (of
Allah) and those around it glorify the praises of
their Lord, and believe in Him, and ask forgiveness
for those who believe (in the Oneness of Allah)
(saying): “Our Lord! You comprehend all things in
mercy and knowledge, so forgive those who repent and
follow Your Way, and save them from the torment of the
blazing Fire! (al Quran)
But Of course we know that Ali is the demigod of
the Rafidah Shias so insulting or even cursing him
makes one obviously an Infidel/Fasiq/Fajir.
Rawafid you usually bring up a Ahadith ‘..no one
but a believer would love you (Ali)…’ that is
mentioned in Sahih Muslim. But what about the Ansar
and Muhajireen ?And since Rawafid are ignorants of
Sunni narrations, they fail to notice the five
Ahadith that preceed the “loving Ali” Ahadith,
and they are…
1- It is reported on the authority of Anas that
the Messenger of Allah (may peace and blessings Be
upon him) observed: The sign of a hypocrite is the
hatred against the Ansar and the sign of a believer is
the love for the Ansar.
2- It is narrated on the authority of
Anas that the Apostle (may peace and blessings be upon
him) said: The love of the Ansar is the sign of faith
and hatred against them is the sign of dissemblance.
3- Al-Bara reported it from the Apostle
(may peace and blessing be upon him) that he observed
with regard to the Ansar, None but the believer loves
them, none but the hypocrite hates them. He who loved
them loved Allah and he who hated them hated Allah. I
(the narrator) said: Did you hear this hadith from al-Bara’?
He said: To me, he narrated it.
4- It is reported on the authority of
Abu Huraira that the Messenger of Allah (may peace and
blessings be upon him) said: A person who believes in
Allah and the Last Day never nurses a grudge against
the Ansar.
5- It is narrated on the authority of
Abu Sa’id Khudri that the Messenger of Allah observed:
The person who believes in Allah and the Last Day
never nurses a grudge against the Ansar.
So if we were to follow Rafidi
illogic, then we shall reach to the conculsion that
Ali (ra) was a hypocrite, since he fought against an
army that had Ansar in it.
But Alhamdullillah we are not from the Rafidah to jump
to stupid conculsions. The fact is that the
war/insults etc did not take place due to hatred of
one another, but due to dispute in the matter
of Qisas for Othmans (ra) blood.
Allah (swt)
said: If two parties of believers fall into a quarrel,
make ye peace between them.
Allah didn’t called one party to be
hypocrite or Kuffar but addressed them but as
believers. And then He (swt) said: “Indeed
the believers are but Brothers. Therefore reconcile
the differences between your brothers,
Even the most sacred Rafidi Book (Nahj Al Balagha)
(fabricated book according to us) contain such statmen
(Namely that Muawiya and co. were considered as
brother in faith by Ali):
The thing began in this way: We and the Syrians
were facing each other while we had common
faith in one Allah, in the same Prophet (s) and on the
same principles and canons of religion. So far as
faith in Allah and the Holy Prophet (s) was
concerned we never wanted them (the Syrians) to
believe in anything over and above or other than what
they were believing in and they did not want us to
change our faith. Both of us were united on these
principles. The point of contention between us
was the
question of the murder of Uthman. It had
created the split. They wanted to lay the murder at my
door while I am actually innocent of it. -- Source:
Rafidi website al-islam.org
Here you go… Clear proof that doesn’t need
explaination, however I will walk you through it…
A) We and the Syrians were facing
each other while we had
common faith in one Allah
from this part we can conclude that the Syrians who
pledged allegiance to muawiya (and headed by Muawiya)
had faith in ALLAH!
B) …in the same Prophet
the Syrians who pledged allegiance to Muawiya
(which include muawiya r.a. and were headed by muawiya
) BELIEVED in MUHAMMAD as the messenger of Allah and
from amongst them was Moghaira Ibnu Shu3ba!.
and to blast the Rawafid away : In Sunan Bayhiqi it
is narrated that on the eve of the war of Jamal, Ali
Radhi
Allaahu ta’ala ‘anh was asked about the opponents (Talha
and Zubayr etc.):
“Are they Mushrikeen?” He replied:
“They have run from shirk and come into Islaam”
Then he was asked “Are they Munafiqeen?”
He replied “Munafiqeen are those who don’t
remember Allah, except a little
(while the opponents do a lot of Zikr)”
Then he was asked “Then what are they?” He
replied:”They are our brothers who
have rebelled from us”
[Sunun Bayhiqi - Dairat ul Ma'arif edition page 173
vol 8]
EsinIslam.Com
|
Save
Add Comments To This Story